“`markdown
Is Pure HTML + CSS + JS Still Relevant?
As a freelance web developer, I’ve recently noticed a trend in returning to pure (handwritten) code for small to medium-sized projects.
I started my journey with basic HTML, quickly transitioned to WordPress, and more recently, began using Webflow. However, my technical background often leaves me feeling limited by Webflow, particularly in terms of CSS selectors.
A few months ago, a client requested a simple “digital business card.” Using Webflow or WordPress felt excessive for a site that rarely needs changes. So, I opted for HTML/CSS/JS, and I must say, CSS has come a long way! While I was familiar with flexbox and grid, many “tiny improvements” had flown under my radar, prompting me to update my knowledge on the latest advancements.
Lately, I’ve been adopting an early 2000s approach, creating websites in a text editor. Not every project requires this, but for many small to medium sites, a complex CMS isn’t necessary, especially when the primary content update each year is the copyright date. Additionally, basic hosting is much more affordable compared to platforms like Webflow.
But what about clients needing to update their websites themselves? In my experience, only a handful of clients actively update their sites—or require a blog for that matter. They typically reach out to me for updates.
I ensure clients are aware ahead of time, explaining that while hosting costs are reduced, any website updates will incur my hourly fees. For those needing changes once or twice a decade, this remains the most cost-effective solution.
What are your thoughts? Do you still code manually?
Note: While I was somewhat aware of recent web development trends, much of the detailed changes eluded me. And, most clients who “need” a blog usually end up posting only one entry.
“`
2 responses to “Are Pure HTML, CSS, and JavaScript Still a Viable Approach?”
Certainly! Here’s a detailed analysis of the question using Markdown formatting:
Is Pure HTML + CSS + JS Still Relevant?
Yes, pure HTML, CSS, and JavaScript development remains very much relevant, especially for specific types of projects. The approach of hand-coding web pages has its advantages, particularly when dealing with smaller projects that don’t necessitate the overhead and complexity of a full content management system (CMS) like WordPress, or a platform like Webflow. Let’s break down the reasons why this method still holds value today:
Advantages of Using Pure HTML + CSS + JS
1. Performance and Optimization
2. Cost-Effectiveness
3. Flexibility and Control
4. Educational and Professional Growth
When to Use Pure HTML + CSS + JS
Considerations and Alternatives
1. Client Needs:
2.
It’s intriguing to see a resurgence in the use of pure HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for smaller projects! Your point about the diminishing need for complex CMS solutions is spot on, especially for clients who only require infrequent updates.
In addition to cost-effectiveness and simplicity, there’s also something gratifying about hand-coding. It allows for greater control over the code architecture, which can lead to cleaner, more efficient websites. Plus, for developers looking to stay sharp, diving into the nuances of CSS properties and JavaScript functionality can deepen one’s understanding of web standards and performance optimization.
I’m curious about your thoughts on long-term maintainability. While it’s true that many clients don’t update their sites frequently, providing them with an easy way to make minor modifications—even something as simple as changing text or images—could enhance their experience. Perhaps a lightweight CMS or a straightforward way to embed a content management feature could strike a balance, offering them flexibility without the overhead of a full platform.
Also, with the advancements in HTML5 and CSS3—not to mention the growing ecosystem of JavaScript frameworks—have you considered how these tools could enhance your projects while keeping the coding experience intact? It might be worth exploring libraries like Vanilla JS or small CSS frameworks that offer utility without complicating the code-base.
What do you think? Would you be open to mixing some lightweight frameworks or tools with your approach, or do you prefer to stick purely to hand-coded solutions?