Client Agreed to Minimal Website for €300, Got Full Site, Then Ghosted and is Now Refusing to Pay Full Amount

Understanding Client Disputes in Web Design Projects: Navigating Payment and Professional Boundaries

In the freelance web development industry, navigating client relationships can sometimes lead to challenging situations, especially when payments are contested or delayed. Below is a detailed case highlighting one such experience, offering insights into managing payment disputes ethically and professionally.

Case Overview:

A freelance web developer was approached by a client in December for a website project. During initial discussions, the developer outlined two options: a full-featured website costing €1,000, and a minimal version priced at €300. The client opted for the minimal package, assuming it would align with their budget.

Delivery and Subsequent Developments:

The developer delivered the minimal site as agreed. However, the client was dissatisfied and requested the comprehensive version initially discussed. Considering the context and mutual understanding, the developer proceeded to develop the full website, trusting that payments would follow accordingly. This decision was based on a foundation of trust, without formal contracts, but with clear communication in chat logs.

The client approved the completed site, used it extensively, and initially expressed willingness to pay the remaining balance, which included a partial payment of €100 upfront and a subsequent payment of €400, with a promise to settle €500 more in two weeks.

The Dispute and Its Escalation:

Despite the initial agreement, the client subsequently became unresponsive for three months. When re-engaged, the client apologized for delays, cited financial difficulties, and promised to fulfill the payment obligations. Months later, the client sent a partial payment but then contested the full billing, claiming the site was incomplete and asserting that they had already paid €700—a figure inconsistent with prior agreements.

Currently, the client continues to use the website without having paid the full amount, raising concerns about the professionalism and fairness of utilizing the product without compensation.

Legal and Ethical Considerations:

While no formal contract exists, the developer retains chat records substantiating the agreement and communication. The developer controls hosting access, enabling potential remedial actions like suspending the website.

However, before taking any action, it is important to consider ethical boundaries and potential professional repercussions. Engaging in actions such as taking the site offline or reaching out to mutual contacts should be approached thoughtfully:

  • Taking Down the Website: Temporarily suspending the site until payment issues are resolved can be justified, especially if the agreed-upon payment terms are breached. It can serve as leverage while maintaining professionalism.

  • Warning Mutual Contacts: Informing or


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *