Understanding Ambiguous Design Requests: Navigating Vague Project Requirements
Hello everyone,
Today, I’d like to share a recent experience that highlights the challenges of interpreting unclear project directives and the importance of clear communication in development workflows.
Imagine being handed a task simply labeled: “Create the brand’s look and feel.” No supporting files, no visual references, just the logo. Naturally, this leaves developers to interpret the scope and intent on their own.
In my case, I approached the task by focusing on establishing a cohesive visual identity—defining color schemes, typography, and consistent design elements. To achieve this, I developed a theming system where modifications to a central configuration would seamlessly propagate throughout the application, ensuring scalability and reusability.
However, after presenting my implementation, I received feedback that the actual requirement was much narrower: to make the login screen visually appealing using the brand’s colors. I suggested extending the theming approach to cover the login interface, but there was no response. A few hours later, I was informed that I was being removed from the project, despite having no prior negative feedback or indications of dissatisfaction.
The situation was further complicated by unprofessional remarks during daily stand-ups, which felt unnecessary and unhelpful.
This experience raises important questions for developers and project managers alike:
- How should ambiguous directives like “create the look and feel” be handled to prevent miscommunication?
- Was my focus on a scalable, global solution misplaced given the vague requirements?
- What strategies can be employed to clarify expectations and ensure everyone is aligned?
Clear communication is vital, especially when project specifications are not explicitly detailed. When faced with vague instructions, proactively seeking clarification or offering multiple interpretations can help align team efforts and deliver satisfactory results.
Thanks for taking the time to read. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and experiences on managing ambiguous project requirements.

