Future of Microdata Tagging: Schema.org Without JSON-LD

Experiment: Is Microdata Tagging Relevant in 2024? (Complete Schema.org Without JSON+LD)

I’m revisiting a project from over five years ago to determine the significance of microdata tagging on websites. From trusted sources, I’ve learned that search engines can interpret the full schema described by Schema.org. While these tags might not alter their display in rich results, they often enhance a page’s ranking.

Despite advancements in the W3C community group spec, the Schema.org GitHub repository remains vibrant. It seems that many organizations now embrace the full specification, suggesting its continued relevance. Perhaps this data assists in AI training?

Plan to Test the Hypothesis:

  1. Manually incorporate schema tags into a forthcoming article using HTML, applying microdata tagging to one page.
  2. Compare the organic traffic with a recent articles baseline over two weeks.

Executing the first step has proven tedious; it took me nearly two hours to tag just half of the article properly. Though I found numerous efficient validators, I couldn’t locate satisfactory tools for tagging. Any recommendations would be appreciated.

Context: Our company website’s traffic is minimal (<5,000 visitors). I’m aware that JSON+LD is the ideal and straightforward method for implementing rich results. I’ve spent the last several days researching independently, but I aim to validate a different hypothesis through this experiment. I plan to share the results if there’s interest, though I doubt they’ll hold substantial significance concerning traffic volume.

Feedback Request: How can I enhance this experiment? It’s not live yet, allowing for adjustments until mid-next week.

TL;DR: I’m conducting an A/B test to assess if an article tagged with full spec Schema.org microdata outperforms a standard one. How would you suggest executing this experiment with a visitor count under 5,000?

Hubsadmin

2 responses to “Future of Microdata Tagging: Schema.org Without JSON-LD”

  1. To effectively design and implement an experiment to determine the relevance of microdata tagging (using the full schema.org specification without JSON+LD) in 2024, you should consider several foundational components for a systematic approach. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help shape your experiment:

    Experiment Design

    1. Objective Definition

      • Goal: To determine if microdata tagging influences the ranking and organic traffic for articles on your website.
      • Hypothesis: Articles tagged with microdata using the full schema.org spec will attract more organic traffic and higher rankings compared to non-tagged articles.

    2. Content Selection

      • Choose two sets of articles that are similar in terms of topic, length, and targeted keywords.
      • Use articles that have not been previously published to ensure that past metrics do not influence the experiment.

    3. Implementation

      • Article A: Implement the schema.org tags using HTML microdata format. This should include properties relevant to your content, such as article, author, headline, datePublished, image, etc.
      • Article B: A control article without microdata tagging.

    4. Execution Period

      • Publish both articles around the same time. Allow a consistent observation period, such as 2-4 weeks, ensuring the potential emergence of traffic or ranking changes.

    5. Comparison Metrics

      • Organic Traffic: Use tools like Google Analytics to track traffic numbers explicitly coming via search engines.
      • SEO Performance: Utilize Google Search Console to monitor changes in impressions, clicks, and position.
      • Engagement: Analyze metrics such as page views, average time on page, and bounce rate.

    6. Data Collection & Analysis

      • Gather data continuously over the observation period.
      • Employ statistical analysis methods to assess if any observed difference in traffic between Article A and Article B is statistically significant.

    Tools and Resources

    • Validators: Ensure your microdata is correctly implemented by using tools such as the Google Structured Data Testing Tool or the Rich Results Test.
    • Automation Tools: Consider plugins or CMS tools that might help generate or assist in tagging articles with microdata.
    • Tracking Tools: Set up and verify Google Analytics and Google Search Console for monitoring performance metrics.

    Reply

  2. This is a fascinating experiment that dives into an essential aspect of SEO and structured data! While your focus on microdata tagging is commendable, I’d suggest a couple of ways to enhance your approach and ensure your findings are informative.

    Firstly, consider expanding your timeframe beyond two weeks for the comparison. Given that search engines can take time to reindex and rank content, a more extended period might yield clearer insights into the impact of your microdata efforts. Perhaps a month would provide sufficient data to observe any meaningful changes.

    Additionally, it might be beneficial to complement your A/B testing with qualitative metrics. While traffic is important, analyzing metrics like average time on page, bounce rate, and user engagement could provide more context on how these changes impact user experience and content interaction.

    Lastly, regarding tools for simplifying your microdata tagging process, have you looked into browser extensions like the Schema Creator or the Microdata Generator? They can help streamline tagging and reduce the manual overhead you’re currently facing.

    I’m very interested in your findings and how the nuances of microdata might still play a role in SEO strategies, especially as we move deeper into 2024. Looking forward to your updates!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *