What would you have done if a ticket just said “create the brand’s look and feel”?

Understanding Ambiguous Project Requirements: A Reflection on Design and Communication Challenges in Web Development

Have you ever encountered a project brief that was surprisingly vague, leaving you to interpret the expectations on your own? Recently, I faced such a situation that prompted me to reflect on the importance of clear communication and requirement specification in web development projects.

The scenario involved a task labeled simply as “create the brand’s look and feel.” There were no visual references—no Figma files, screenshots, or style guides—only the company’s logo. Naturally, I interpreted this as a request to develop the visual identity, including colors, typography, and consistent design elements. To address this, I built a flexible theming system that allowed for easy updates of colors and fonts throughout the application via centralized configuration. My goal was to create a scalable, reusable solution that could adapt as needed.

However, after presenting my implementation, I was taken aback to learn that the actual requirement was solely to enhance the appearance of the login screen with the brand’s colors. I suggested extending the current approach to encompass this specific page, but received no response. A few hours later, I was informed via email that I was being removed from the project.

Throughout the process, there was no explicit negative feedback—only a casual remark during a daily stand-up about how “I’m busy because I actually work,” which felt inappropriate and unhelpful in context.

This experience raises a critical question for developers and project managers alike: How should one approach projects with vague directives such as “create a look and feel”? Was my focus on building a comprehensive, scalable theming system misplaced in this situation? And more broadly, how can teams improve communication to ensure everyone shares a clear understanding of project goals?

Navigating ambiguous requests requires probing for clarification, establishing shared expectations early, and maintaining open lines of communication. Clear, detailed requirements prevent misunderstandings and streamline the development process, ultimately saving time and fostering a more productive collaboration.

Have you faced similar situations? How do you handle vague or incomplete project briefs to ensure successful outcomes? Share your insights and experiences in the comments below.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *