Understanding the Frustration Behind Switching Tech Stacks: A Developer’s Perspective

As a seasoned developer, I often find myself caught in a cycle of exploring new frameworks and tools, yet struggling to settle down. Currently, my technology stack includes Angular and Java (Spring) paired with Amazon Cognito for authentication — a setup I’ve grown quite familiar with. However, I can’t shake the feeling that the process is often bogged down by boilerplate code, making progress feel slow and cumbersome.

Recently, I experimented with SolidJS combined with Django and SuperTokens, aiming for a more dynamic and flexible architecture. While I appreciated the simplicity and rapid component creation that SolidJS offered, it introduced a level of unfamiliarity that was unsettling. The extensive freedom it provided made me worry about potential pitfalls, which slowed my development pace.

After this experiment, I returned to my original stack—Angular and Java—using Amazon Cognito for authentication. Despite the initial frustrations, this setup feels more manageable and familiar, especially as I focus on building a SaaS product. Yet, I often compare my timeline with others who seem to launch similar products in under a month, leaving me feeling like I’m taking too long.

One major challenge I face is the rapid evolution of my tools. Angular rolls out new major versions frequently, and Amazon Cognito isn’t far behind with its updates. This constant flux can be exhausting and disrupt my workflow. Ultimately, I crave a straightforward authentication process that I can easily maintain, possibly sticking to a stable version of Angular or a similar framework.

In summary, the desire to experiment and improve is natural, but it also highlights the importance of stability and simplicity in building effective and timely SaaS solutions. Finding a balance between exploring new technologies and relying on proven, dependable tools is key to consistent progress.