Why Do Users on LinkedIn Act Like NPCs?
As I navigate through LinkedIn, I notice a trend among the individuals I have connected with, particularly those who claim to be SEO “experts” and “influencers.”
My feed is constantly bombarded with posts that contain mundane and unoriginal content. What puzzles me even more is the abundance of comments on these posts that lack depth and seem to consist of nothing but empty praise. Comments such as “Wow, amazing, very helpful” are left under posts that offer little substance or value.
I can’t help but wonder: does this behavior serve a purpose for these users? Is there a strategy behind this constant stream of superficial interactions?
2 responses to “Why do LinkedIn users behave like NPCs? Help me understand.”
Why Do Some LinkedIn Users Behave Like NPCs?
After connecting with numerous self-proclaimed SEO “gurus” and “influencers” on LinkedIn, I couldn’t help but notice a peculiar pattern in their behavior.
My news feed is constantly bombarded with posts that are filled with cliched and unoriginal advice. What’s even more baffling is the overwhelming amount of insincere praise and admiration in the comments section. It’s as if everyone is programmed to respond with automated responses like “Amazing!”, “Very helpful!”, or “Wow!” – regardless of the actual quality of the content.
But why do they do this? Is there some ulterior motive behind this behavior, such as gaining visibility or boosting engagement metrics? Let’s delve deeper into the psyche of these LinkedIn users and unravel the mystery behind their NPC-like actions.
It’s a thought-provoking observation you’ve made about LinkedIn interactions! The behavior you describe might stem from several factors that highlight the evolving dynamics of social media, even on platforms like LinkedIn that are meant for professional networking.
First, there’s the notion of **social validation**—users often seek affirmation in the form of likes and comments, which can drive them to engage in superficial interactions. This can create a feedback loop where quantity is prioritized over quality. It’s important to note that many users may not feel comfortable sharing their genuine thoughts or criticisms for fear of negative feedback or misunderstanding.
Moreover, we also see a phenomenon of **content fatigue**. With so much information available, it’s tempting for users to stick to safe, agreeable comments instead of engaging deeply with complex topics. This can be partly attributed to the algorithmic nature of feeds, which often reward engagement metrics over substantive discussions.
Lastly, there’s the impact of professional branding. Some individuals feel the need to present themselves in a particular light, often leading to polished comments that lack authenticity. As a result, they may prioritize being seen rather than being understood.
Perhaps encouraging more thoughtful engagement can start with us—by leading by example and crafting insightful comments on posts that spark our interest. What do you think would motivate users to move beyond the “NPC” behavior you’re observing? Creating a culture of genuine interactions might require a concerted effort to share valuable, thought-provoking content and to respond meaningfully, fostering a deeper conversation across the platform.