What’s the worse bulk 301 redirect project of your career?

“`markdown

Reflecting on the Most Challenging Bulk 301 Redirect Project of My Career

I’ve been feeling a bit nostalgic lately, especially since we’ve moved beyond manual mapping for 301 redirects. The new programmatic and algorithmic solutions available to us now are a blessing for up-and-coming Technical SEOs, sparing them from some of the challenges we’ve faced. ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜†

One project that still stands out in my memory was a Magento build back in 2016. The client continuously changed category URLs, right up until the day before launch. This was particularly challenging since these categories were part of the product URL taxonomy.

We prepared a file with 75,000 URLs, carefully checked and ready to go. But the next day, the Project Manager would inform us that we needed to run it again. I can’t remember how many times we had to redo it, but I do recall spending 33.5 hours in one week alone just on rebuilding the file. It’s an experience I’d rather not repeat!
“`


2 responses to “What’s the worse bulk 301 redirect project of your career?”

  1. Wow, that sounds like quite the ordeal! I can completely understand the relief of moving past those manual URL mapping days, and it’s great to see how far we’ve come with programmatic solutions for handling 301 redirects more efficiently. Hereโ€™s my own tale of redirect woes:

    The Legacy Nightmare of 2014

    Back in 2014, I was involved in a massive site migration project for a long-established, content-heavy site. The project was full of challenges, but perhaps the most hair-pulling part was dealing with the site’s convoluted URL structure. Here’s how it unfolded:

    Project Background

    • Platform: Custom CMS transitioning to WordPress
    • Scope: Over 200,000 pages
    • Challenge: Inconsistent URL patterns and deep directory levels

    The Redirect Challenge

    1. Disorganization: The original site had grown over nearly a decade with little central oversight. This meant URLs were a mish-mash of inconsistent structures โ€“ some included article IDs, others clean slugs, and random directories sprinkled throughout.

    2. Key Personnel Changes: At the same time as the migration, there was significant turnover in the companyโ€™s IT department. Essential insights into the logic behind the original URLs were lost with the departing team members.

    3. Dynamic Sections: Some sections still generated dynamic URLs at runtime with parameters relevant to old site logic, meaning a huge part of our URL list didnโ€™t actually exist in conventional file structure to begin with.

    The Solution Attempt

    • Manual Mapping: Like your experience, we initially began mapping redirects manually. It quickly became apparent that this was untenable across hundreds of thousands of pages.

    • Pattern Identification: We shifted focus to identify patterns among URL groupings, aiming to create wildcard redirect rules.

    • Excel Overload: Endless hours in Excel, attempting to match and group URLs, wore down the sanity and patience of everyone involved. Multiple revisions became the norm as unforeseen patterns reared up.

    The Findings and Fixes

    • Programmatic Approach: Eventually, a developer was brought into the fold who wrote a custom script in Python. The script scrapped and sorted by pattern recognition, automating much of what was manually tearing us down.

    • Testing Hell: Despite automation, relentless testing was still needed to finalize plausibility across thousands of cases. Regular expressions became both our savior and headache.

    The Outcome

    • Successful Migration: We somehow managed to fold this complex web with more automation
  2. What a relatable experience! Itโ€™s fascinating how the evolving landscape of SEO tools is easing the burden of bulk URL changes. Your Magento project illustrates a critical pain point many have facedโ€”constant shifts in URL structure can not only lead to frustration but also impact SEO performance if handled poorly.

    One takeaway from such challenges is the importance of incorporating a URL freeze period in a project timeline, especially as a launch date approaches. This could significantly reduce last-minute changes and help maintain consistency in the redirect strategy.

    Additionally, while automated tools are a game changer, combining them with thorough manual checks can ensure accuracy and minimize the risk of errorsโ€”particularly with a large volume of URLs. Have you also found that keeping open lines of communication with clients about the impact of frequent changes helps in managing expectations? Thanks for sharing your valuable insights!

Leave a Reply to Hubsadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *